"Senior Management" enables a researcher to discuss his PhD after being proven to be unfair
The Supreme Administrative Court overturned the decision of the Vice-President of Cairo University to cancel the registration of the doctoral dissertation of a researcher who holds a master's degree in a precise specialization in science, and decided to enable him to register the letter and discuss it after proving that he was subjected to injustice.
The ruling was issued by Naji Al-Zafatawi, Vice-Premier of the State Council and the members of the councilors Salah Helal, Abdul Ghani Al-Zayat, Wael Manna, Dr. Mohammad Mahmoud Shawqi, Vice-Premier and Subhi Abdul Ghani.
In 2006, the physics department board canceled the registration of the applicant, who filed a petition to cancel the cancellation of his registration. The vice president agreed to facilitate the judgment on the doctoral thesis. The Dean of the Faculty of Science, one of the professors of physics By reading the letter, which was found to be valid for discussion and fulfilled the conditions, but the Council of the department refused to register and approved Vice-Rector rejection.
The judge said: "It was proven to the court, from reading the memorandum of the legal adviser of the National Research Center, the existence of a previous dispute between the appellant and his department, and the researcher was affected by the suspension of his salary and not enable him to use his computer, as indicated earlier by the head of the Department of theoretical nature, By the researcher by expelling him, and joining forces with the department against him, with no equal to his colleagues, as well as the confirmation of the head of the department to prevent him from entering and signing in the disclosure of attendance and departure So the court assured him that he was clearly injustice within the section, and treated cruel individual treatment compared to colleagues, The head of the department intreated him and harassed him Tha has different ways, most recently to maintain payroll and attendance, in order to deprive him of the signature and then claim to be absent, so the court found that this behavior involves evident abuse, which represents a departure from the requirements of presidential responsibility.
Although the applicant obtained a master's degree in the legal period, in a rigorous and difficult specialization, it was proved that the university had misused its authority with him. The decision to cancel the registration of his doctoral dissertation violated the rule of law and must be abolished.
Related topics
Post a Comment