June 9 .. Consider the case of unconstitutional Palace of the right of vision to parents and grandparents without mahrams of women
The Commission of Plenipotentiaries of the Supreme Constitutional Court decided on 9 June to consider the claim that the text of the second paragraph of Article 20 of Law No. 25 of 1929 concerning some personal status provisions replaced by Law No. 100 of 1985 amending certain provisions of personal status laws is unconstitutional.
The appeal against the text of the second paragraph of Article 20 of the Personal Status Law included limiting the right of sight to fathers and grandparents without mahrams from women because they contradict the fifth and sixth paragraphs of the same article. , 9, 10, 51, 93), article 11, paragraph 4, and articles III and VI of article 80 of the present Constitution.
Related topics
. (tagsToTranslate) Supreme Constitutional Court (t) Personal Status Law (t) Right of View (t) Unlawful Law (t) Incest of Women
Post a Comment