Rights: The Brotherhood used the human rights file to distort Egypt, relying on politicized organizations

Policy

Ayman Nasri, head of the Arab Forum for Human Rights in Geneva, said that following the June 30 revolution and as a result of the political dispute with the Egyptian people, the ruling of the Egyptian terrorist group was terminated for a period of one year, which is considered by many the worst period in the history of modern Egypt. And the attempts to destroy it by inciting violence to kill innocent civilians and recruit some of the abducted youth intellectually to carry out terrorist operations that would destabilize the security of Wallace. Internal fixation for revenge for what happened to them.

He added that among the illegal methods resorted to by the Muslim Brotherhood, the use of the human rights file as a tool to distort the image and use it as a political tool to settle the account with the Egyptian state, and this happened through some international human rights organizations, And even this moment through the financing of suspicious provided by some countries, which have a political dispute with the Egyptian state and hostile to it.

The president of the Arab Forum for Human Rights said that it had subsequently evolved into a new thinking in using the file to undermine Egypt's international reputation through the establishment of some human rights organizations belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood, taking advantage of the ease of establishment procedures and the presence of a large number of members of the group abroad, The main role of which is the continuous attack on Egypt and improving the image of the Muslim Brotherhood abroad and its perception that it is a group that does not use violence and has been abused by the Egyptian state to win the sympathy of the international community and pressure on Egypt politically and economically.

Ayman Nasri continued: "There are several examples that we can prove to the lies of the Muslim Brotherhood and the falsification of reports on the human rights situation. Perhaps the most important of these reports, which the group tried to promote abroad to discredit Egypt but did not succeed, is to decide the dismantling of a fourth sit-in, "The figures of the victims were very different and completely contradictory. The international community did not accept this report, which the group tried in various ways to pass to condemn the Egyptian state and failed to achieve that malicious goal."

The President of the Arab Forum for Human Rights, the second example is the reports that emerged from the enforced disappearance in Egypt through the Muslim Brotherhood and these reports appeared on the sidelines of the 39th session of the International Council for Human Rights, and pressed the group very much to pass these reports and give them the official form by pressing on The Commission on the Disappearance of the Office of the High Commissioner for official acceptance, and therefore the condemnation of Egypt, which did not happen, which caused the group a state of frustration, because they were in this period were very much rely on this report as part of the scheme to try to tarnish the image of Egypt abroad.

Related topics