Al-Marchei doctor .. He got 5 thousand pounds in exchange for the appointment of urgent surgery in the brain
He never imagined being accused of bribery, after being one of the most famous neurosurgery doctors in his specialty. That's the doctor. Who was sentenced to three years in prison by the Court of Cassation on charges of taking a gift to himself for performing a job, after earning 5,000 pounds for surgery to remove a brain tumor for a person in the hospital where he works.
The doctor is accused of being a professor at the Faculty of Medicine. However, as a public servant, a neurologist is working in a public hospital. He asked for a job to perform a job. To take action to issue a decision to treat him at the expense of the state in the Department of Neurosurgery, for a tumor in the brain and pituitary gland.
In the meantime, I met Mrs. Huda. Who had become the first witness in the case, with the accused in his private clinic, presented him with the decision, and as the person responsible for performing the required surgery and setting the date of the operation, asked for 5 thousand pounds for bribery, in exchange for an urgent appointment for surgery for her brother, , Which led to the release of a communiqué of administrative control, which resulted in secret inquiries about the authenticity of what was reported by the witness, and obtained permission from the Public Prosecution to record meetings and telephone conversations between them.
The administrative control recorded the meetings and telephone conversations, which led to the recording of several meetings confirmed the request of the accused doctor 5 thousand pounds as a bribe, in exchange for an urgent appointment for surgery at the expense of the state in the hospital where he works, and to complete the gathering witness and accused meeting in March 2012 During which he brought the amount of bribes agreed upon and set a date for his receipt. On the due date, he took the amount prepared by the administrative control, and after his receipt, he was arrested by the administrative control officer.
The Public Prosecution assigned the accused, following his confirmation of the incident, that in his capacity as a public servant, he requested and took a gift for himself to perform a function of his job and referred him to the criminal court which sentenced him to 3 years' imprisonment. The defendant challenged the judgment and challenged the number 23766 for judicial year 87, The veto supported the ruling and rejected the appeal.
Related topics
Post a Comment