The veto: The omission of the Public Prosecution mentioned the reasons for its appeal against the ruling leading to its inadmissibility
The Court of Cassation affirmed that the appeal submitted by the Public Prosecution requires that it be allowed to state the reasons for its appeal against the ruling, and the fact that it is not mentioned is the reason for the non-acceptance of its appeal.
The court said during its hearing of appeal No. 23082 for the year 87 2018/06/06 hearing, that the prosecution's decision to appeal against the verdict to convict the contestants against them and to limit the memorandum of reasons to appeal to the adaptation of the ruling for one without the other. The effect of not accepting the appeal before the last form.
She explained, "Since the Public Prosecution has decided to challenge the veto in the judgment contested in the conviction of the contestants against them: 1. ….. 2 – ….., but since the evidence of the reasons for the appeal that it was limited to the custom The sentence contested in the sentence convicted the first convict, and was completely free from raising the name or reason to get the verdict against the second defendant, making the appeal for him free of the reasons, and therefore must be ruled not to accept the appeal of the prosecution before the second contestant. Shape.
Post a Comment