What is the difference between the judge of urgent matters and the judge of temporary matters?

Breaking news

"The Court of Urgent Matters and the Court of Temporary Matters" Many do not know the difference between them, and in the framework of the continuous services provided by the seventh day of readers, we present to you today a simple explanation to know the difference between them in the following lines:

The judge of urgent matters is the one who considers matters and matters in which he fears that the time is too late, where there is a real and imminent danger to the right, which necessitates taking temporary action to protect the origin of the right. The procedure is temporary. The judge does not adjudicate the original of the right and assess the imminent danger. Things are urgent.

In cases where there is no commencement courts, the Magistrate's Court shall issue its judgments in matters that are considered urgent, so that it is not sufficient to shorten the time limits of the ordinary judiciary to protect the dispute. The sentence shall be recorded within 24 hours from the time of the pronouncement Shall be subject to appeal within five days from the day following the notification thereof, and the judgment shall be irrevocable.

The legislator distinguished between cases in which the law provided for a certain period of time to be decided as labor cases, taxes and arbitration. In these cases, the original of the right must be separated within a specified time period specified by the law and thus it is different from all the urgent matters taking into consideration that the legislator left the opponent free to raise The matter shall be referred to the judge of urgent matters or to the competent court for consideration of the case.

.